Symphony of Psalms
Symphony of Psalms with liturgy for Evening prayer
Robinson College Chapel, Tuesday 8 March, 6.30 pm
`It is not a symphony in which I have included Psalms to be sung. On the contrary, it is the singing of the Psalms that I am symphonizing.' --- Igor Stravinsky
Tomorrow instead of our usual Choral Evensong we are doing a liturgical performance of Stravinsky's Symphony of Psalms in Robinson College Chapel. The college musicians contribute a great deal to the life of the Chapel, and in planning their forthcoming repertoire we talked over some of their planned music, and I noticed that the Symphony of Psalms was thought of as a concert piece, rather than as music for worship. We then put our heads together and came up with the idea of a liturgical performance.
In our post-Christian age it is easy to
overlook the spiritual significance that sacred works held for their composers.
Like many composers before him Stravinsky chose sacred texts not because of the
obligations of patronage or the conventions of the time, but following a profound
personal engagement with the text. He wished to express something of that
spiritual engagement through music, and in doing so to place their spiritual
vitality in a contemporary cultural expression. ‘Real tradition is not the
relic of a past that is irretrievably gone,’ he said, ‘It is a living force
that anticipates and informs the present.’
The raw honesty of the Psalms has inspired
their readers for thousands of years. The Psalmists expressed the range of
human emotion from delirious joy to utter despair, often giving words to things
that seem at first sight to be unmentionable in a religious context – emotions
that defy expression, questions it seems impertinent to ask, questions that
defy a rational answer. Both in unimaginably tough circumstances, and on the
receiving end of undeserved blessing, the Psalmists demand “why?” of God. And
even though answers sometimes remain elusive, the Psalms resolve into peaceful
or determined acceptance.
Stravinsky begins with a Psalm of lament which
reflects the fragility and temporality of human life, and walks close to the
edge of despair. The second movement is a Psalm of hope, looking with faith
towards the possibility of redemption. And the third movement is unreserved
joy, calling people to celebrate God from the heart, with every kind of musical
noise.
This liturgy uses readings and prayers drawn
from the Book of Psalms to further draw out this movement from despair, through
hope, to joy.
We will be joined by members of the choir of Girton College, and their Chaplain, Rev'd Dr Malcolm Guite. The Stravinsky will be conducted by Alec Frank-Gemmill.
Bummer bummer bummer.
The one place I can't possibly be next Tuesday is Cambridge (well, not strictly true...what I really mean is that I am firmly tied to Ch Kings...but the other sounded better!) and I would so love to be there...
Do you fancy trying the same thing with the Bernstein Chichester Psalms too, one day? If so, please may we have more than half a minute's notice??
Posted by: Kathryn | 03/03/2005 at 17:05
Sorry K - you know how we Cambridge animals always do everything at short notice....
but we are doing a Tenebrae service on Sunday the 13th if that's any use to you? (no, you'll be taking Evening prayer, won't you?)
Posted by: maggi | 03/03/2005 at 17:09
Hope the week has been unfoldng OK :-)
Posted by: Paul Fromont | 03/03/2005 at 17:43
Wow - a piece that's been on my 'to do' list for over 20 years (embarrassing to admit)!
If it's better than the Bernstein it will be heaven.
Posted by: Christopher Shell | 03/03/2005 at 17:52
13th is part of my Good Weekend...ie the CME session with Jonny in Devon. Nearest thing to a holiday I look like getting for a good long while. Tenebrae would hve been lovely.
Posted by: Kathryn | 03/03/2005 at 18:46
So sorry I can't be there - for a Baptist I have a very odd love of liturgy.
Posted by: Hugh (Serena's Dad) | 03/03/2005 at 21:02
We did one movement of the Chichester Psalms last year, and the Stravinsky promises to be a real experience. Having done all the Bernstein with another choir previously, and now doing the Stravinsky, I count myself a very lucky girl!
Posted by: Serena | 03/03/2005 at 21:34
I've blogged elsewhere about liturgy recently. Having lived with Anglican liturgy all my life, it's recently come alive for me (but a 'Celtic' rather than Anglican)
The intriguing question for me is a tension between new, innovative and traditional. There's tension (perhaps a dialectic? -can I use as a noun that way?) perhaps paradox is a better word ... I'm scratching around for a way to say that at one and the same time liturgy is as comfortable as an old pair of slippers, as C. S. Lewis said and also an adventurous exploration.
and I think that I've just proved that you can't wrap it up in long words ...
I do hope that the service excites and delights you all.
Posted by: Caroline | 03/03/2005 at 22:46
Just a thought - the bigger and greater the piece of sacred music, the better (not worse) it works liturgically, and the more of a missed opportunity it is to perform it in a mere concert. (Arent concerts sometimes so contextless? They are presented visually even tho' the entire feast is an aural & spiritual one.)
We were terribly envious as boys to hear that our men singers had done the Missa Solemnis at Midnight Mass; it was the Matthew Passion that reduced hardened hearts to tears; and Belshazzar's Feast that filled the abbey with an electricity that made people walk restlessly up and down, unable to 'get over' the effect of the music.
Every move to overcome this unnecessary liturgy/concert dualism is a very good thing.
Posted by: Christopher Shell | 04/03/2005 at 11:43
Wish I could be at Cambridge to hear the Stravinsky Symphony of Psalms tomorrow night. Since I live in Madison, WI, USA that's impossible Thedrefore can you or anyone else out there tell me about a CD that has a recording of it? Will you do a recording?
May the setting amidst the liturgy show both the struggle, hope and joy that is always prevelant in the psalter.
Posted by: Wil Bloy | 07/03/2005 at 23:07
I'm intrigued by your comment . . .
What is POST-CHRISTIAN about our age?
Posted by: Dr. David Holsinger | 26/04/2005 at 21:23
I'm intrigued by your comment . . .
What is POST-CHRISTIAN about our age?
Posted by: Dr. David Holsinger | 26/04/2005 at 21:23
post-Christian in the sense that one can no longer assume, in countries such as the UK, that the majority of people subscribe to Christianity as the "norm", or as their own default religion
because the majority no longer have CHristian "assumptions" and a working knowledge of Christian doctrine and scriptures, they also don't easily recognise the Christian assumptions of generations that went before. Thus, for instance, some philosophers of the 18th or 19th century are read without any reference to their Christian beliefs, which, arguably, skews the whole understanding of their thought.
Posted by: maggi | 27/04/2005 at 10:41